Training-cost clauses: when must you repay a course?
Your proposal is saved only on this device. It is not sent and does not change the website.
SHA-256: db46f48743e3a85203a88843b2294794e7871d34c6ca934affc1ea01bd2c18e1Current article text
Training-cost clauses: when must you repay a course? An employer that pays for training may request repayment when you leave. Whether that is justified depends first on the training itself, then the agreement. Training the employer must provide free under applicable rules cannot be charged back through a training-cost clause. For other training, wording, clarity and circumstances still matter. First check whether the training is subject to the statutory duty to provide it free. Signing a clause does not validate prohibited repayment. Ask for the agreement, actual costs and reducing-balance calculation if a claim is made. 1. What was the purpose of the training? Ask why the course was taken: your current work, safety, necessary competence or your own career wishes? Article 7:611a of the Dutch Civil Code governs training duties and the free provision of certain training. This includes training the employer must provide under applicable rules for the work you were hired to do. Classification requires specific assessment. Calling a course “voluntary” does not settle the matter if the employer actually required it for your job. Conversely, not every course useful to your profession automatically falls under the same regime. A professional qualification, work-study programme or course for a future different role may raise special questions. Keep role requirements, the vacancy, collective agreement and messages explaining the training. 2. Consequences of mandatory free training If the statutory duty to provide free training applies, the relevant costs cannot be recovered from the employee through a repayment clause or offset against wages. The training counts as working time and should take place during working hours where possible. Check not only tuition fees but other necessary costs and the treatment of training hours. A 2026 judgment shows an employer could not demand repayment despite a signed agreement when the court classified the training as necessary under the rules. Another case may turn out differently with different training requirements. Use a judgment to understand the test, not as proof that every employee taking a course with the same name automatically gets the same outcome. 3. Assess the agreement for other training Where repayment may be allowed, it must be clear which costs are repayable and under what circumstances. Ask when you agreed and what information you received then. A general reference to future costs does not automatically make the financial risk sufficiently clear. Have the collective agreement and staff handbook compared with the individual agreement too. A usual assessment examines the period in which the employer benefits from the training, proportional reduction of repayment during that period and clear explanation of financial consequences. Circumstances and reasonableness remain relevant. Ask what happens if the employer dismisses you, progress is insufficient, you become ill or the role disappears. One standard sentence covering every departure may leave considerable room for dispute. 4. Recalculate the costs claimed Request invoices, payment evidence, subsidies, credit notes and a breakdown per item. An estimate in the training agreement need not match the amount actually paid. Check when the reduction period starts: at the beginning, qualification or completion of a component. This can make a major difference. Also have it assessed whether internal supervision or paid hours can be included under the agreement. A calculation is useful only after the clause and cost items have been legally assessed. For a valid €3,600 agreement reducing over 36 equal months, half may remain after eighteen relevant months, for example. This does not establish that three years or that amount is appropriate in your situation. Example: the employer uses an old total The course originally cost €4,000, but the provider refunded €800. Ask how that credit note was processed before checking the repayment percentage. The calculation base and reduction are separate steps. 5. Wage deductions and a departure agreement An employer cannot simply treat a disputed training-cost claim as established. Before final pay, ask which amounts will be deducted and on what basis. Wage protection and the nature of training may limit set-off. Dispute the claim in writing if appropriate and ask for undisputed pay to be paid on time. In a VSO, you may agree that the employer waives training costs. Specify the amount and clause, checking for contradictory terms elsewhere. A future employer offering to assume the debt does not automatically clarify your liability. Record who pays, when and what happens if the new job does not proceed. 6. Addressing a disputed claim Collect the contract, training agreement, collective agreement, course requirements and full calculation. First set out the substantive reasons why you should pay nothing or less. Obtain legal advice if the amount is large, wages are deducted or proceedings begin. Merely discussing a payment plan may unintentionally create uncertainty about whether you admit the debt. Continue ordinary work and study arrangements while they remain applicable. Stopping work yourself to contest the claim can create another dispute. If departure is approaching, seek clarity in time so your start date and financial planning are not based on an unassessed claim. A training-cost ruling is also separate from any short deadlines for dismissal or transition-payment applications. Record the training purpose and mandatory job requirements. Check the collective agreement, contract and when consent was given. Request actual costs, subsidies and credit notes. Calculate reductions only after assessing the legal basis. Dispute incorrect deductions in writing and keep evidence. Must I pay because I signed? Not always. A clause contrary to the statutory duty to provide training free may be void. For other training, the agreement, clarity and circumstances need assessment. The signature is one part of that check. Are all professional courses free for employees? That cannot be assumed as a general rule. The statutory training duty, role, collective agreement and nature of the qualification determine the position. Have the actual reason and requirements investigated. Can the employer include paid hours as training costs? That depends in part on the training and the validity and wording of the agreement. Costs of statutorily free training cannot be recovered by that route. Ask for a separate breakdown. Can my new employer pay the costs? You can agree this, but first check whether the original claim is justified. Record payment and consequences if the move falls through. An offer to assume a debt does not validate an invalid claim. Sources and editorial notes Sources current as of: October 17, 2026 1. Dutch judiciary: necessary training, ECLI:NL:RBOBR:2026:857 Publisher: Rechtspraak https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI%3ANL%3ARBOBR%3A2026%3A857 2. Dutch judiciary: training classification and costs, ECLI:NL:RBOVE:2023:336 Publisher: Rechtspraak https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI%3ANL%3ARBOVE%3A2023%3A336 3. House of Representatives: statutory training and free provision Publisher: Officiële bekendmakingen https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/h-tk-20212022-71-24.html 4. Dutch government: collective agreements and employment terms Publisher: Rijksoverheid https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/vraag-en-antwoord/arbeidsovereenkomst-en-cao/wat-is-een-cao The source publications are in Dutch. All language editions cover Dutch law.
Compare with the source
Current article text
My proposed edit
No local proposal saved yet.
Your proposal is saved only on this device. It is not sent and does not change the website.
Read the guideSources and editorial notes
The sources used for this page are listed below. Open the original publication for the full rules and context.
Sources current as of:
- Publisher: RechtspraakDutch judiciary: necessary training, ECLI:NL:RBOBR:2026:857uitspraken.rechtspraak.nlhttps://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI%3ANL%3ARBOBR%3A2026%3A857
- Publisher: RechtspraakDutch judiciary: training classification and costs, ECLI:NL:RBOVE:2023:336uitspraken.rechtspraak.nlhttps://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI%3ANL%3ARBOVE%3A2023%3A336
- Publisher: Officiële bekendmakingenHouse of Representatives: statutory training and free provisionzoek.officielebekendmakingen.nlhttps://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/h-tk-20212022-71-24.html
- Publisher: RijksoverheidDutch government: collective agreements and employment termsrijksoverheid.nlhttps://www.rijksoverheid.nl/vraag-en-antwoord/arbeidsovereenkomst-en-cao/wat-is-een-cao
The source publications are in Dutch. All language editions cover Dutch law.