In this article
- Pay suspension concerns verifying entitlement
- Pay stoppage needs a different statutory ground
- Notification must be clear and timely
- Medical inability differs from unwillingness
- UWV can help with a dispute
- You do not have to accept a dismissal proposal
- Build a targeted response
- Example: an appointment missed because of hospital attendance
Pay suspension concerns verifying entitlement
During illness, statutory conditions permit suspension if you do not follow reasonable written monitoring instructions about information needed to establish pay entitlement. Examples include availability for checks or attending the occupational physician. Not every information request is permitted. You do not have to disclose a diagnosis to your manager. Ask what check is missing and how to comply. Once the suspension ground is resolved, the question of arrears also needs assessment.
Pay stoppage needs a different statutory ground
Article 7:629 BW identifies situations without pay entitlement, including certain unjustified refusals of suitable work or reasonable reintegration measures. The facts and any valid reason for the employee’s conduct need investigation. Missing an appointment is not automatically equivalent to refusing all reintegration. Ask why the employer considers this heavier measure appropriate. The terminology in a letter matters, but its substance and factual basis must always be read together.
Notification must be clear and timely
The employer cannot freely add a pay measure retrospectively as a surprise when preparing the payslip. Ask when the reason was identified and how you were informed. Keep letters, emails and earlier warnings with receipt dates. Case law shows that absent or late notification may affect validity. This does not mean every awkward phrase automatically decides your whole claim. The actual content, reason and conduct need assessment together.
Medical inability differs from unwillingness
If your health prevents attendance or certain tasks, report this specifically and in time. Request occupational-physician contact and a suitable alternative, such as another meeting time or format. Share medical information with the authorised doctor, not unrestrictedly with HR. Keep requests. Disagreement about capacity needs substantive medical or occupational assessment. Cutting off all contact yourself makes it harder to demonstrate the cooperation you did offer.
UWV can help with a dispute
An expert opinion can assist disputes about suitable work, incapacity for your own job or reintegration efforts. A second opinion concerns doubts about the occupational physician’s advice. Choose the question actually blocking progress. Applying does not automatically suspend current obligations or a pay measure. Ask explicitly what is expected meanwhile, and assess whether a wage claim or urgent proceedings are needed for immediate income loss. Waiting for experts without a plan can worsen the financial problem. Payment may require a wage claim before the subdistrict court; a lawyer is not mandatory. Where suspension is also involved, return to work may be sought alongside wages. Match the procedure to the remedy needed: payment, resumption or both, and potentially interim relief if urgent.
You do not have to accept a dismissal proposal
An employer may suggest a settlement during a conflict. Refusing that proposal is not itself a statutory reason to stop sick pay. Published case law expressly makes that distinction. Continue responding to separate reasonable reintegration arrangements. For example, explain that you are having the termination proposal assessed and remain available for medically suitable discussions. This prevents all correspondence being treated as if signing an agreement were the only form of cooperation.
Build a targeted response
Start with the letter and disputed pay period. Identify the reason as understood, the fact challenged and cooperation offered. Request withdrawal, payment and substantiation of the statutory basis. Attach a brief timeline of physician advice, invitations and responses, not an unwieldy complete medical file. Where needed, have a lawyer determine whether an expert statement is required for wage proceedings and what exceptions exist. Correct procedural preparation prevents discussion focusing only on the amount.
Example: an appointment missed because of hospital attendance
You miss a check because of unexpected hospital attendance. Report the reason as soon as possible, request a new appointment and offer relevant information to the occupational physician. Keep confirmations without unnecessarily disclosing diagnoses to the employer. If the employer immediately imposes permanent pay loss, ask why the explanation, opportunity to check and correct measure were not considered. Outcome depends on the facts; this example principally shows which documents and alternatives should be recorded early.
Practical checklist
- Keep the measure, warning and receipt date.
- Request statutory ground, pay period and remedy route.
- Record medical assessment and cooperation offered.
- Have arrears, expert opinion and urgent proceedings assessed in time.
Apply this explanation to your situation
Continue with a related calculation, decision aid or worksheet. Your answers stay on your device.
Unpaid wages: calculation and draft requestRecord one unpaid wage amount and the maximum statutory increase, then prepare a written request.Prepare your return-to-work timelinePut the key stages of long-term illness on a personal calendar and identify the documents you need to check.Build your employment law case fileCreate a chronological record of facts, reference documents and bring your objective and open questions together in one transferable worksheet.Frequently asked questions
Will suspended salary be paid later?
Valid suspension postpones payment. After monitoring is restored, pay entitlement and any necessary arrears must be assessed.
Can the employer demand my diagnosis?
A manager has no unlimited right to medical information. Assessment goes through the occupational physician; ask which necessary work details may be shared.
Does applying for an expert opinion stop the measure?
Not automatically. Agree interim arrangements and promptly assess the appropriate legal route if pay is lost.
Is stopping pay the same as dismissal?
No. A pay measure does not terminate employment. Dismissal requires its own ground, procedure and deadline assessment.
Sources and editorial notes
The sources used for this page are listed below. Open the original publication for the full rules and context.
Sources current as of:
- Publisher: RechtspraakRechtspraak: statutory grounds for pay measures, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2025:15411uitspraken.rechtspraak.nlhttps://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI%3ANL%3ARBROT%3A2025%3A15411
- Publisher: RechtspraakRechtspraak: refusing a termination proposal and pay, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2023:3264uitspraken.rechtspraak.nlhttps://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI%3ANL%3ARBROT%3A2023%3A3264
- Publisher: RechtspraakRechtspraak: notification of a pay measure, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2024:2492uitspraken.rechtspraak.nlhttps://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI%3ANL%3ARBROT%3A2024%3A2492
- Publisher: RechtspraakRechtspraak: wage claimsrechtspraak.nlhttps://www.rechtspraak.nl/onderwerpen/loonvordering
The source publications are in Dutch. All language editions cover Dutch law.
General information. Not a substitute for personal legal advice. This language edition contains draft translations based on official Dutch sources. Independent final legal review and native-language editing have not yet been recorded.
This language edition contains draft translations based on official Dutch sources. Independent final legal review and native-language editing have not yet been recorded.
Editing wikiLegal review
Not legally reviewed yetThis version has not been reviewed by a lawyer or legal professional. Checking sources or editing text is not legal approval.
Editorial team Arbeidsrecht in Nederland
We connect explanations to sources and record targeted changes. Legal review is attributed only to the actual reviewed version, with a real reviewer, date and scope. Human legal review of these articles remains open.

Ricardo van der Spoel
Editorial responsibility · Editorial organisation and technology